๐Ÿ“ฑ Phase 1 - Anticipation ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ Visual + Poll โฑ 4 minutes

Task 1 - Would You Believe This?

Three health posts. Rate how believable each one looks - before you check a single fact.

Step 1 - Rate how believable each post looks
๐ŸŒ…
@risewell.daily
Wellness blog ยท 2 days ago
"5 Minutes of Morning Sunlight 'Resets Your Metabolism,' Says Study. I started doing this every day and within a week I had more energy than ever. Try it before you reach for coffee!"
โค๏ธ 12.4k likes ยท ๐Ÿ’ฌ 890 comments ยท ๐Ÿ” 3.1k shares
๐ŸŒถ๏ธ
@naturalcure.secrets
Sponsored post ยท 5 hours ago
"DOCTORS SHOCKED: This $3 Spice Lowers Blood Pressure Better Than Medication! Big Pharma doesn't want you to know this one trick. Limited stock - order now!"
โค๏ธ 34.7k likes ยท ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2.2k comments ยท ๐Ÿ” 9.8k shares
๐Ÿ”ฌ
@scitranslate
Science communication ยท 1 week ago
"New research links a common food dye to hyperactivity in some children. Findings vary between studies, and researchers say more research is needed before drawing firm conclusions."
โค๏ธ 1.1k likes ยท ๐Ÿ’ฌ 76 comments ยท ๐Ÿ” 240 shares
๐Ÿ’ก Here's the twist
Post 1 and Post 2 both sound confident and are getting huge engagement - but they make very different kinds of claims with very different levels of evidence behind them, and Post 2 even uses urgency language ("limited stock") and a conspiracy angle ("Big Pharma doesn't want you to know"), both common persuasion techniques. Post 3 sounds the most cautious and got the least engagement - but cautious, hedged language ("findings vary," "more research is needed") is often a sign of more honest science reporting, not less. Believability and popularity are not the same as accuracy.
Step 2 - Your vote
Can you trust health information you find online?
Let's learn a framework for telling the difference - the 5C Health Check.

What happens in Task 1

A 4-minute Phase 1 - Anticipation activity. Students rate three fictional health posts for believability, discover that confident, popular posts aren't necessarily accurate, and vote on whether they trust online health information.

๐ŸŽฏ Learning objectives

To recognise that believability, confidence and popularity are not reliable indicators of accuracy in online health content.

โ™ฟ SEN Adaptations
  • Posts available as read-aloud; simplified rating (believable/not believable only)
๐Ÿ–จ๏ธ No-Tech Format
  • Lab Booklet page 1: three printed posts with a rating scale