⚖️ Phase 3 - Investigation ⚖️ Critique ⏱ 10 minutes

Task 5 - Group B: The ICT Critic

While Group A researched the "how-to" of survival, your job is evaluation and ethics: look at their tools and ask, "Is this actually helping us survive, or is it a trap?"

⚖️
Your role: The ICT Critic
Focus: evaluation and ethics. For every benefit the Protectors found, find one hidden cost - then take a side in the Ethics Jury debate.
Critique challenges - tap to open each one
1
The "Double-Edged Sword" Audit
For every "Benefit" the Protectors found, identify one "Hidden Cost." Example: if Group A says "social media spreads cultural beauty," you might critique: "But does it also turn that culture into a trend that people consume and then forget?"
2
The "Algorithm Police" roleplay
Investigate how specific apps are designed to break our Silence & Focus. How does an app's design specifically target our Inner Motivation, replacing it with a need for "likes" or "clout"?
3
The "Wonder vs. Echo" analysis
Does the internet actually help us discover diverse perspectives, or does it just show us more of what we already like (the Echo Chamber)? Think of a time an algorithm led you down a "rabbit hole" instead of somewhere new.
Your deliverable
Group B deliverable
Write 3 "Hidden Costs" for the Protectors' tools, then take a stance in the Ethics Jury.
1
2
3
The Ethics Jury - 4 Corners Debate
Statement: "Anonymity is the only way to survive online."
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
✅ Reality Check submitted - Group C will build with what you've learned.
Bridge to Group C
"Your tools are powerful, but how do we make sure the technology serves our identity, rather than our identity serving the technology? Group C will now build a real answer."

What happens in Task 5

A 10-minute Phase 3 - Investigation activity as "Group B - The ICT Critic." Students open three critique challenges, then write three "Hidden Costs" for the Protectors' tools and take a stance in a 4-Corners Ethics Jury debate on anonymity.

🎯 Learning objectives

Focus on evaluation and ethics - reviewing tools identified by Group A and asking whether they actually help us survive, or introduce new risks (digital commodification, addictive design, echo chambers).

♿ SEN Adaptations
  • Voice input accepted for all three "Hidden Cost" fields
  • Simplified 2-position debate (Agree / Disagree) available on request
🖨️ No-Tech Format
  • T-Chart drawn on shared poster paper instead of a digital board
  • Physical 4-Corners debate - students actually move to a labelled corner of the room